João Freitas

The following is the reference for structured logging messages as well as how they should be rendered.

https://messagetemplates.org/


Message Templates

A language-neutral specification for 1) capturing, and 2) rendering, structured log events in a format that’s both human-friendly and machine-readable.

This document explains the reasons message templates are used, and provides a specification of their syntax, capturing behavior, and rendering behavior, to assist in creating implementations for various programming languages and logging interfaces.

A brief history of structured logging APIs

Early application logging, or printf debugging, produced a stream of text describing the events taking place within an application.

log("User %s logged in from %s", username, ipAddress);
  // -> 2016-05-27T13:02:11.888 User alice logged in from 123.45.67.89

This worked well for simple applications running on a single computer, and over the years many tools evolved to help support this format in ever-more-complex, and ever-more-distributed applications. Log parsing can extract most of the relevant information from the event above, but considerable effort is required for non-trivial diagnostic scenarios.

At various times, alternatives to text logs have been proposed under the banner of structured logging, which considers log data to be a stream of fully-structured events with key/value properties. Structured log events are much easier to work with in large, complex and distributed applications, because relevant events can be identified using queries over their properties, rather than by regular expressions over a text payload.

The obvious method of recording structured log events, found particularly in languages with terse key/value property syntax, is to encode the event directly as a map of key/value pairs:

log({eventId: "user_logged_in", username: username, ip_address: ipAddress });
   // -> {"time": "2016-05-27T13:02:11.888", "eventId": "user_logged_in",
   //     "username": "alice", "ip_address": "123.45.67.89"}

JSON is used as an example rendering here, but the concept is not tied to a particular representation.

This greatly improves machine-readability, enabling queries like username = 'alice' on the raw log stream, but the event itself is not human-friendly. Log events recorded in prose make full use of our language processing and pattern recognition abilities to ease cognition. A long stream of key/value pairs is painful to visually process. Compare the representative output of the two examples above to experience this effect - what’s happening in the second event?

Another approach employs convention to identify properties within a printf-style message:

log("User username=%s logged in from ip_address=%s", username, ipAddress);
  // -> 2016-05-27T13:02:11.888 User username=alice logged in from ip_address=123.45.67.89

In principle, this technique benefits from greater readability, but in practice the looseness of the format causes ambiguities when parsing, and inconsistent usage within development teams. Ambiguities arise when a property inserted into the event contains embedded spaces and/or = characters. The lack of a defined grammar (and lack of awareness of the grammar in the logging tool) means developers have no opportunity to validate their use of the syntax – breaking the convention is easy and goes unnoticed.

Finally, niche logging systems like Event Tracing for Windows have taken a middle ground, combining event ids in the log event with a manifest of format specifiers describing how a particular event can be rendered as text. Despite the near-perfect balance of performance, human-friendliness and machine-readability, the effort associated with assigning event ids and managing manifests have an impact on development-time ergonomics that limit the appeal of this system.

All of these issues and shortcomings have kept fully-structured logging from reaching widespread adoption, but the need for it has continued to grow.

Message templates overview

Message templates take the best of all these approaches to provide optimal human-friendliness, perfect machine-readability and excellent development-time ergonomics.

A message template is a format specifier with named holes for event data:

User {username} logged in from {ip_address}

Message templates are unique in that they provide a means of capturing the event, as well as a means of rendering it into human-friendly text.

Logging APIs capture log events by positionally matching arguments with the named holes:

log("User {username} logged in from {ip_address}", username, ipAddress)
  // -> {
  //      "time": "2016-05-27T13:02:11.888",
  //      "template": "User {username} logged in from {ip_address}", 
  //      "username": "alice", 
  //      "ip_address": "123.45.67.89"
  //    }

An event captured using a message template is not immediately rendered into text unless it is being displayed directly to a user. Instead, the template itself is captured, along with property values for each argument. This is stored in an intermediate representation like JSON for processing.

Because the template remains constant regardless of the actual property values substituted, it is possible to treat the template as an event type that identifies all events from the same template. In this example, log-ins from various users will carry the different username values, but the consistent message template shared by all of them means they can be retrieved as a group.

When the event is displayed to a human user, or searched for text, it is rendered by replacing each of the named holes with the corresponding property:

// -> User alice logged in from 123.45.67.89 

Syntax

A message template is a block of text with embedded holes that name a property to be captured and inserted into the text.

The grammar below is maintained in the messagetemplates/grammar repository; images generated by Railroad Diagram Generator.

Template

Template

Template

Template ::= ( Text | Hole )*

Text

Text

Text

Text ::= ( [^\{] | '{{' | '}}' )+

Hole

Hole

Hole

Hole ::= '{' ( '@' | '$' )? ( Name | Index ) ( ',' Alignment )? ( ':' Format )? '}'

Name

Name

Name

Name ::= [0-9a-zA-Z_]+

Index

Index

Index

Index ::= [0-9]+

Format

Format

Format

Format ::= [^\}]+

Alignment

Alignment

Alignment

Alignment ::= '-'? [0-9]+

Capturing rules

A message template may be used to capture properties when provided a list of argument values.

Matching template properties with argument values

Each property in the message template is associated with exactly one value in the argument list.

Behavior in the presence of invalid/repeated names is implementation-dependent.

Operators

Prefixing a property name with the @ structure capturing operator is a hint that the the structure of the corresponding argument should be preserved, for example, by serialization.

The $ stringification operator hints that the corresponding argument should be converted into a string represenation for capturing.

If no operator is present, capturing behavior is implementation-dependent.

Rendering semantics

Given a set of property values, and a message template, implementations should render the template by substituting property values into the locations of the corresponding named holes.

Message template rendering should optimize for legibility and the conventions, culture, and context into which the message is being rendered:

Implementations

The following logging libraries have support for message templates.

* Converts a custom capturing syntax to message templates for rendering and storage

Library missing from this list? Let us know so that we can add it.

#reads #messagetemplates #logging #structured #reference